New Click-to-Cancel Requirements… Welcome/Not Welcome?
Nov 15 2024
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced its long-awaited final Negative Option Rule (the “Rule”) on October 16, 2024. “Negative Options” according to the FTC are arrangements “under which the consumer’s silence or failure to take affirmative action to reject a good or service or to cancel the agreement is interpreted by the negative option seller as acceptance or continuing acceptance of the offer.” Such a broad definition could affect a business in just about any industry serving consumers. The FTC estimates (within its comments in the Rule) that over 106,000 businesses currently utilize negative options. In your personal life as a consumer, the Rule may be a welcome development to help manage one’s subscriptions. If you are reviewing the Rule as a business owner, your compliance countdown looms and taking stock now of changes you may need to make is advisable. Some provisions of the Rule take effect 60 days after the Rule is published in the Federal Register; most aspects of the Rule take effect 180 days after it is published in the Federal Register, including disclosure of important information, consent and simple cancellation).
The core provisions of the Rule require businesses using negative options (e.g., recurring subscriptions) for goods and services to provide consumers with a simple cancellation method and to avoid false and misleading practices in connection with the options overall. The FTC has authority to seek significant money damages in connection with such practices it determines to be false or misleading. Statutory damages at the time of this article come close to $52,000 per violation (these are adjusted upward annually for inflation).
The Rule’s “click-to-cancel” provision requires that consumers be able to cancel a recurring subscription made via a negative option in as simple a manner as they signed up for it. Cancellation must be provided by the same means the consumer signed up to purchase the good or service. For example:
The Rule has a “clear and conspicuous” disclosure standard, meaning information needs to be presented as “easily noticeable and understandable” by ordinary consumers. This definition is consistent with the FTC’s “conspicuous” standard under its recently revised Guides Concerning Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising, which basically means a required disclosure is unavoidable.
The Rule further benchmarks “easily noticeable and understandable” as follows:
The Rule does not preempt any state laws that also address negative options except to the extent the state law is inconsistent with the Rule’s provisions (and then limited to the extent of the inconsistency). Businesses are encouraged to take into account applicable state negative option/subscription laws alongside the Rule. Businesses that use negative options also need to exercise care not to run afoul of the federal Restore Online Shoppers’ Confidence Act (ROSCA).
Not all businesses are happy to have to comply with the newly updated Rule. On October 23, 2024, several industry groups (NCTA-The Internet & Television Assoc., the Electronic Security Assoc. (ESA), and the Interactive Advertising Bureau (IAB)) representing numerous companies in the cable industry, home security, and assorted online advertising businesses sued the FTC in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals to enjoin the FTC’s application of the Rule. The IAB alone, for example, self-describes as having over 700 members, including “leading media companies, brands and agencies.”1 The thrust of this petition to enjoin the Rule seems to relate to not wanting to make subscriptions easier to cancel. The FTC for its part is on the record with being motivated to thwart unscrupulous sellers who “don’t tell the truth or leave out necessary information,” bill people who did not agree to pay, and “make it hard – or impossible – to cancel.” While the petition is pending in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, the Rule remains in effect.
Certain federal legislators have also signaled to the FTC that it should pause enforcement and policy making given the transition from the Biden administration to the Trump administration will likely result in leadership changes at the FTC that could impact what issues the FTC prioritizes. How this change impacts the FTC remains to be seen; in the interim, the Rule remains in effect.
For more information about the Rule and how it may apply to you, please contact the authors of this alert or your Womble relationship attorney.
1 See www.iab.com/our-story/ (last visited November 15, 2024).